CATX vs. Rawlings Icon: USSSA -8 Showdown - Which Bat Reigns Supreme?

This article presents a head-to-head comparison of two leading USSSA -8 bats: the CATX Composite and the Rawlings Icon. Both bats are triple ASA certified and promise exceptional performance, but which one reigns supreme? This in-depth analysis examines key performance metrics, including exit velocity, swing feel, sweet spot size, and break-in period, to determine which bat offers the superior combination of power and consistency for players. We delve into the strengths and weaknesses of each bat, providing a detailed assessment to assist players in making an informed decision.The showdown features the popular, consistently performing CATX Composite against the revamped Rawlings Icon, which has undergone design modifications to improve upon previous versions. Through rigorous testing, we compare their power output, swing characteristics, and overall effectiveness to ultimately declare a winner. Discover which bat offers the optimal blend of power, forgiveness, and immediate readiness, helping you make the right choice for your game.

Pros And Cons

Rawlings Icon
  • Very good
  • Extremely balanced in drop 8 and drop 10
  • Pretty balanced across the board
  • A little bit too thin of a grip
  • Severe lack of a taper
  • Takes almost too long to break in
  • Smaller sweet spot than the CADX
CADX Composite
  • Has about the same break-in swings as the Rawlings Icon
  • Sounds ready to go a lot sooner than the Rawlings Icon
  • Bigger barrel than the Rawlings Icon
  • Larger sweet spot than the Rawlings Icon

Read more: Top 5 Best BBCOR Baseball Bats in 2024

The Contenders: CATX Composite vs. Rawlings Icon

This USSSA -8 showdown pits two heavy hitters against each other: the popular CATX Composite and the Rawlings Icon, a recent re-entry into the bat market. Both bats boast triple ASA certification, promising significant power and performance. The Rawlings Icon, however, has undergone modifications including re-gripping and a taper addition, addressing some initial grip issues reported in earlier versions.

Close-up shot of the Rawlings Icon bat.
Close-up shot of the Rawlings Icon bat.

The CATX, a well-established favorite amongst players, is known for its consistent performance and balanced feel. We'll examine both bats' performance characteristics to determine which one emerges victorious.

Performance Comparison: Exit Velocity and Distance

Both bats displayed impressive exit velocities throughout the testing. The Rawlings Icon delivered consistent hits in the 260-315 mph range, demonstrating solid power. However, the CATX Composite showed a slightly higher average exit velocity and produced several impressive long-distance hits.

Exit velocity readings for the Rawlings Icon.
Exit velocity readings for the Rawlings Icon.

The testing methodology involved multiple swings with each bat, ensuring a fair comparison. Consistent and powerful hits highlight the exceptional quality of both bats.

Swing Feel and Sweet Spot Analysis

The Rawlings Icon, while powerful, felt slightly lighter and required a longer break-in period to achieve optimal performance. The CATX, on the other hand, delivered a more immediate, satisfying swing feel and a noticeably larger sweet spot.

Testers consistently reported a more forgiving and expansive sweet spot on the CATX Composite. This characteristic could significantly improve batting averages and overall performance.

Final Verdict: The Winner is...

While both the Rawlings Icon and the CATX Composite proved to be high-performing USSSA -8 bats, the CATX Composite emerged as the clear winner in this showdown. Its larger sweet spot, more immediate readiness, and higher average exit velocity made it the more consistent and ultimately more effective bat.

Final screen showing the winning bat.
Final screen showing the winning bat.

The Rawlings Icon’s impressive power shouldn't be discounted; however, the longer break-in period and smaller sweet spot make it a less forgiving option compared to the CATX. For batters seeking maximum power and a larger margin for error, the CATX Composite is the superior choice.