The Easton CXN batting tee has generated considerable buzz, but does it live up to the hype? This review delves into the pros and cons of this popular training aid, comparing it directly to the industry benchmark, the Tanner Tee. We examine the assembly process, the build quality, and the crucial performance aspects of the tee's design, specifically focusing on the topper and base stability. Our assessment considers both the advantages and shortcomings to help you decide if the Easton CXN is the right investment for your batting practice needs.This in-depth review covers key areas like initial setup and ease of assembly, highlighting potential quality control issues encountered during the testing phase. We analyze the durability of the topper material and its impact on overall performance. Ultimately, we weigh the Easton CXN's price point against its performance and longevity compared to its more established competitor, offering a balanced perspective to inform your purchasing decision. Are the cost savings worth the potential drawbacks? Read on to find out.
Pros And Cons
- Base is significantly improved compared to older Easton models.
- Eight-pound weight in the center helps the tee self-balance, reducing the need to constantly pick it up.
- Rubber base flexes, preventing it from falling over easily when mishit.
- Assembly can be difficult; some units are much stiffer than others.
- Topper is of poor quality, easily frayed and prone to coming off.
- Height adjustment is difficult; lacks a stopper and requires excessive force.
- Inconsistent quality control; noticeable differences between units in terms of topper alignment and stiffness.
Read more: ATEC Baseball Batting Tee: 4-Pack for Practice
Initial Impressions and Comparison to Tanner Tee
Upon initial assembly, the Easton CXN batting tee felt just 'okay'. Compared to the industry-standard Tanner Tee, it lacked a certain level of quality and refinement. The build quality felt slightly less robust, and the overall feel wasn't as premium.
However, there were aspects that I found appealing. The weight distribution, for example, seemed well-balanced, making it more forgiving for errant hits compared to a more rigid tee like the Tanner.
The base design was noticeably improved compared to older Easton models. It's more stable and provides better resistance against toppling over.
Assembly Challenges and Inconsistent Quality
One of the most frustrating aspects was the assembly process. One tee was extremely difficult to assemble, requiring significant force to separate the components. This was in stark contrast to the other tee which went together smoothly.
This inconsistency in assembly suggests potential quality control issues. The variance in how easily the tubes separate within the frame raised significant concerns about the manufacturing process.
Such differences in ease of assembly are unacceptable and raise doubt about the long-term durability of the product.
Problematic Toppers: A Major Design Flaw
The toppers were a significant point of concern. The two-layered design (rubber and vinyl), was poorly implemented. The vinyl layer was easily frayed and prone to peeling off.
The design appears to be an attempt to mimic the Tanner Tee but falls short in quality and execution. The materials used for the toppers seem inadequate and of low durability.
The poor quality of the toppers, the constant detaching of them and the overall inferior materials used are a significant drawback.
Overall Assessment and Recommendations
Despite the issues with the toppers, the base and central weight design of the Easton CXN are significant improvements over their previous model. The heavy base design improves stability and reduces the need for constant adjustments.
For those handy with DIY repairs, the Easton CXN might be a worthwhile purchase, especially considering the lower cost compared to the Tanner Tee. The potential savings might outweigh the need for topper replacements or modifications.
However, for users who don't enjoy DIY work or prefer a hassle-free experience, the Tanner Tee remains the superior option due to its superior build quality and consistent performance. The superior quality of the Tanner Tee justifies the higher cost.
