This review delves into the comparison of two A2000 baseball gloves: the 1799 and the 12.5/12.75 models. While seemingly similar at first glance, subtle differences in size and, more importantly, glove shaping and leather quality emerge upon closer inspection. The older 1799 model, potentially from 2011 or 2012, boasts a "third baseman" style pocket, contrasting with the more traditional outfielder's shape of the newer 12.5/12.75.This difference extends beyond aesthetics, significantly impacting the glove's feel and durability. The review highlights the markedly thinner "super skin" leather of the 1799 compared to the thicker, more robust leather of the reviewer's other gloves, impacting both longevity and the overall playing experience. Ultimately, the review explores the nuanced differences in performance, break-in characteristics, and personal preference that determine which model reigns supreme. The author’s decision on whether to keep or sell the 1799 underscores the subjective nature of glove selection.
Read more: Top 5 Wilson Baseball Gloves: Ultimate Buying Guide
Initial Comparison: 1799 vs. 12.5/12.75
At first glance, the A2000 1799 and the 12.5/12.75 models appear very similar. The main difference cited is a slight length variation – the 1799 is supposedly a quarter inch shorter. However, this difference is barely noticeable in practice.
A more significant distinction lies in the glove's shaping. The older 1799 model (likely from 2011 or 2012) features a noticeably different glove pocket shape, described as more of a 'third baseman' style, designed for a closed glove position.
The newer 12.5/12.75 model exhibits a more traditional outfielder's glove shape, which is a personal preference for many players.
Leather Quality and Durability
The reviewer notes a significant difference in leather quality. The 1799 model's 'super skin' leather is described as thin, contrasting sharply with the thicker, more durable leather found on the reviewer's David Wright 5 model and a newer KP92 model.
The thicker leather of the David Wright 5 and KP92 models is highlighted as providing superior quality and sturdiness, essential for the longevity of a baseball glove.
This difference in leather quality directly impacts the overall feel and lifespan of the glove, with the thicker leather offering better resilience and a more premium feel.
Gameplay and Break-in
The reviewer discusses the glove's performance during gameplay. He highlights that the preferred method of squeezing the ball is different for each glove. The reviewer prefers the feel of squeezing the ball sideways and demonstrates that the 1799 feels less suitable for this method.
He points out that even brand new, the 1799 already feels 'broken in', unlike the sturdier KP92 model.
This indicates a difference in how the glove breaks in and conforms to the player's hand, potentially affecting the overall playing experience and preference.
Overall Review and Conclusion
Despite the differences, the reviewer states that the A2000 1799 is not a bad glove. He appreciates the A2K-style stitching, logos, and color scheme.
However, the reviewer is unsure whether to keep or sell the 1799 due to its unique break-in characteristics and preference for the more traditional glove shaping of the 12.5/12.75 models.
Ultimately, his Mets fandom may influence his decision to keep it, emphasizing that personal preference plays a crucial role in glove selection. The KP92 is cited as a preferred option due to its superior build quality and longevity.
